There can, it seems, be too much of a good thing.  JR’s inimitable contributions on the vexed issue of physical perfection may, by their popularity, have been responsible for the CPU problems we’ve had over the past few months.

In any event, our hosting service pulled the plug on us on Friday because we were starving other sites filed on the server.  Can’t complain about that.  Bluehost have a duty to their other paying customers.

JR has now cut back our CPU consumption and we are restored to life.  It’s time to apologise to all MR readers who have been confronted by a “Site Suspended” notice over the last couple of days.  We think the situation will be sufficiently stable to allow uninterrupted operation in the short-term.  Long-term, another solution will have to be found - on which more later.

Thanks again for your patience and thanks for coming back.

GW

“We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us.”

“When,” he says.  When!  There before our amazed eyes stands the liberal in all his indifference and naivety, modelled for us with jaw-dropping honesty by the Swedish Integration Minister Jens Orback in a recent interview on Swedish radio.

I think this is just about the clearest statement of liberal-elite intent that I have ever encountered.  The things that folk like us say will come to pass he says too.  But he is totally untroubled by it, suffering from not the slightest remorse or sense of shame.  He simply has no concept of its meaning for his own, sorry people.  One must conclude that he is missing a fair quantity of essential, normalising brain circuitry.  And, indeed, he does seem very like some political parallel of the psychopath whose emotional life is all shallow affectation and whose capacity for love, empathy, guilt, remorse and even fear is in absentia.

Now, tempting though that conclusion is, it might not be the right one.

I say that because some months ago an MR regular pressed upon me the depressing view that, far from being a psychopathy of the elite, Jens’ Total Altruism is an evolutionarily-fit behaviour selected because sympathy is more hard-wired among European peoples than self-preservation.  In essence, then, the liberal zeitgeist that I bang on about all the time is the issue – and not the progenitor - of this new and, for us, final course in the river of life.  It is an effulgence of no meaning in itself except as it is defined by that vital, blind force - a definition, let it be said, that does not include liberalism’s own impertinent denial of that force.

READ MORE...

In the aftermath of the (still ongoing) genocide of whites by the land barons, we have this report from the Los Angeles Times euphemistically titled: “Rich, Poor Live Poles Apart in L.A. as Middle Class Keeps Shrinking”:

Demographers at Wayne State University in Detroit recently found Greater Los Angeles to be the most economically segregated region in the country. The study found only about 28% of its neighborhoods to be middle-class or mixedincome, compared with more than half of those in Nashville, Pittsburgh, Seattle and Portland, Ore.

More than two-thirds of L.A.-area residents live in neighborhoods that are solidly rich or poor, according to the analysis, which is based on 2000 census data. That share has been steadily growing for three decades, said one of the study’s authors, George Galster, a professor of urban affairs at Wayne State…

The trend parallels a well-documented loss of middleincome jobs in the United States over a generation. But the study found that middle-class neighborhoods are disappearing at a much faster rate than the comparable jobs.

The remedies recommended by those the article quotes would be laughable if the situation weren’t so disasterous…

READ MORE...

The cost of reproduction has risen by a factor of nearly 4 since I was born in 1954, fertilizing the portfolios of landlords, or more properly, land barons, with the decomposing marriages, fetuses and sometimes bodies of the bulk of the baby boom generation, leaving a demographic hole being filled with imported slaves* by those same landlords.

The baronage calls this “progress”, even as as the price of homes was removed from the consumer price index while introducing CPI factors like “hedonic value” and “imputed rent” to make it appear “real” earnings have increased over the time period of demographic collapse and loss of ethnic enfranchisement to imported laborers for the baronage.

I call it genocide.

*It is really being too kind to the baronage to call the imported laborers “slaves” since the baronage doesn’t have to pay for their human capital upkeep—the rest of us do via social programs.  Southern Plantation owners were far more moral than these sorry excuses for human beings.

READ MORE...

In The Times this morning we read that:-

THE Home Office is privately warning that 45,000 “undesirable” migrants from Romania and Bulgaria could legally be allowed to live in Britain when the two countries join the European Union next year.

It has drawn up a confidential “warnings index” of people from the two states, most of whom are suspected of having criminal associations or posing a security risk.

According to a paper circulated in Whitehall last week, ministers fear they may be unable to stop these people settling in Britain and claiming state benefits when Romania and Bulgaria join the EU.

The paper reveals that the government privately estimates between 60,000 and 140,000 Romanians and Bulgarians will arrive in Britain in the first year after accession.

Not to be outdone this morning’s Telegraph carries this:-

John Reid has embarked on a major transformation of the Home Office, but one of the causes of its failure has been ignored. In 1999 it was set a target to ensure that 25 per cent of its work force in London was from ethnic minorities by 2009. It exceeded the target by the halfway stage in 2004 and ethnic minorities now make up more than 38 per cent of head office. However, the Home Office “milestone report” also drew attention to an unwelcome side-effect.

Members of ethnic minorities have not performed as well as white staff in Civil Service examinations. Civil servants who hope for promotion attend “assessment centres”, where they take written tests, carry out exercises and are interviewed. In 2004, the results for higher executive officer and Grade 7 assessments were “again disappointing”. The pass rate for minority ethnic staff was “lower than for white staff”.

READ MORE...

Steve Sailer’s latest article in The American Conservative was, as usual, replete with exactly the kind of language we want to see eliminated from public discourse.  So we decided to write to the Great Man and let him know none too gently where he is falling down on the job ...

Steve Sailer,

The reason we think you are a phony in almost everything you write is because of sentences like this one:-

Because the median voter is in his late forties, non-Hispanic whites cast 79 percent of the votes in 2004, according to the Census Bureau, even though they comprise only 68 percent of the total population and just 57 percent of those under age five.

You have to know that calling us “non-Hispanic whites” is a symptom of hostility to the majority of USA voters.  So why are you using a hateful vocabulary that smothers our diversity and reeks of contempt to describe us in the context of an article that seems to argue that Democrats should give some respect to us?  You are really part of that great hate-filled attack on Americans of European origins.  Most people don’t get it, but we see it clearly in your vocabulary and in your arguments.

And we see you like the hate term “gentile” as used in this sentence:-

In the past, it would have been unthinkable for a far Left organization to get a higher proportion of gentile than Jewish support, but the times they are a-changin’.

I don’t know who you think you are fooling, but “gentile” is a name imposed on us.  Many of us reject it out of hand as contemptuous and certainly as part of an effort to smother our diversity in public discourse.  Where do you get the right to slap us with “gentile”?

We’ll leave aside your cheap reliance on the bizarre red-blue state fantasy, but we reject your use of that left-wing, media caricature as unworthy of any thinking person.

Shame on you.

Stanley Womack
ResistingDefamation.org

Repeating a story worth repeating:  A recent court decision has paved the way for “affirmative action” to be applied to the bill of rights itself.  In Harper vs Poway Unified School District:

Judge Reinhardt wrote that a different standard should apply to derogatory remarks aimed at “majority groups such as Christians or whites” because “there is, of course, a difference between a historically oppressed minority group that has been the victim of serious prejudice and discrimination and a group that has always enjoyed a preferred social, economic and political status.”

The decision is up for en blanc review by a panel of 10 judges—a procedure that is reserved for cases that have particularly fundamental legal consequences.

Stanley Womack provides links to the decision and the dissenting opinion. 

Although many are of the opinion that the Ninth Circuit’s extremist decisions are vulnerable to reversal by review, the history of the Supreme Court on majority rights is anything but rational.  Repeated assaults on the law of this type will, over time, eventually decay toward the extremist views through simple omission of judicial review of the bad decisions which then become enshrined in case law as precedent.

PS: Judge Reinhardt’s father was a film director, his mother a screen writer and his wife the executive director of the ACLU of Southern California—all Jewish.

There seems to be serious resistance to using a combative approach to name-calling against our young children along the lines of Abe Foxman and his crew at ADL.  But ADL, ACLU, PAW, and SPLC specialize on a daily basis in a revolting brand of hate speech that has to have a serious negative impact on us and, more to the point, on our young children.

We began Resisting Defamation in 1990, and took its Syllabus on-line a few years later, but intelligent European Americans have not embraced the cause.  We’re not pleading that our version is the only possible version, but where else on the Internet is there a site that attacks back against editors, columnists, and writers who engage in the most repellent smear attacks on us and our children?  We need ten, one hundred, one thousand web-sites bashing back.

I mention intelligent European Americans because IQ tests are more-or-less normed to our continent-of-origin, so there is a possibility that fully one-half of us literally do not understand the need to speak up.  And probably a huge share of those with above average intelligence find it embarrassing, shameful, too costly, or beneath them to speak up.  Why should this be so?

In our local experience, we have materially stung white-bashers, changed behavior, and gotten people who smear us fired from jobs. Just like ADL.  But where are the writers and thinkers who will resist defamation across the North American, Australian, and European continents?

And with our “theory of slurs,” there is no need to whine, discuss your feelings, or claim hurt. Our approach looks at labels as to whether (1) they are contemptuous, (2) they are based on a supremacist claim, or (3) they act to smother our Euro-diversities, histories, heritages, and cultures.  Still, the larger minds among our kin find the concept of speaking out to be beneath them.

It seems that common sense, a ready-made vocabulary, and proven techniques aren’t persuasive to our natural leaders, so I will appeal to authority to get some action.

I imagine we are all aware of the remarkable work of Wilmot Robertson, and the authority and prestige carried by his name and writings.  So let’s take a look at what he said about this phenomenon of silence toward hate speech.

In his book, “The Dispossessed Majority,” first published in 1981, twenty-five years ago, and in his Chapter Ten, “The Decline of the Majority,” he says:

“There are aggressively censorious minority organizations, principal among them the B’nai B’rith’s Anti-Defamation League, which monitor the printed and the spoken word for the most subtle anti-minority allusions. Should any be found, the owner or editor of the offending media and, if necessary, the writer, advertisers and stockholders are so advised and admonished… The Majority, to its great loss, has no similar watchdog organizations.”

Think of that and then think of all the ink spilled, all the electronics hurled through the ether, and all the writing about high-minded theories, but only one anti-defamation Internet-based group is in existence for all of Euro-diversity.  Why the reluctance to tangle with the dominant media culture and the corporate entertainment culture to protect our children?  I’d really like to hear from posters as to why they decline to take Wilmot Robertson’s advice to form “watchdog organizations” especially to secure our Majority Rights.

Stanley Womack

ResistingDefamation.org